Hello. I'm writer Antoinette Beard... WOO-HOO-HOO!!! This is sensual, bizarre & macabre. Keep scrolling after the posts for much weird info and wonky photos. Also, use the "Search Box" to discover more quirky fascinations. Outwardly, Victorians were conformists, but there are always those who delight in flaunting conventions. ADULT CONTENT, --- naturally. ;)
Sunday, April 30, 2017
Saturday, April 29, 2017
Jane Eyre & Mister Rochester, - "Your Life is Mine"...
I definitely thought that this version of "Jane Eyre" was the best one. Toby Stevens was the best and sexiest Mister Rochester and Ruth Wilson as Jane was well cast too. The book said that Jane was not a great beauty. And, Ruth Wilson is not, - but Toby Stevens is!!!... Oh, - yes!!!
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Monday, April 17, 2017
The Sexuality Of The Victorian Bustle...
Curious Contraption: The Victorian Bustle
By Kyshah Hell
FASHION HAS ALWAYS gone hand in hand with sexuality. Not only does it attract members of the opposite sex, but it also highlights alluring portions of the body. And looking good to the opposite sex is just as important as looking good for oneself. When items as curious as the Victorian bustle come into fashion, one must wonder how it came into style; why the male of the species found it attractive considering the exaggerated feature it portrayed and highlighted.
From a 21st century viewpoint, it is easy to see how this posterior plumping style is so sexual, but in the supposedly sexless Victorian era was it a subconscious reaction to the repressed? Throughout history, all cultures and time periods have found all kinds of body parts to sexually objectify and many alluring female styles have their roots in male desires. Women are always looking for ways to make themselves more enticing and the bustle is the perfect example of this. It seems to defy logic, but it makes perfect sexual sense and is perhaps the most curious western fashion of the last 100 years.
The bustle was in style for two distinct periods in the Victorian era. The early period was from 1869 until 1876 and the later period from 1883 through 1889. What is so curious is how it came into fashion twice and how it fell out of fashion for those six years in between. Other than the evolution of fashion, there is no clear answer to this question but one can always speculate.
Both periods had slightly different shapes to the bustle that reflected its evolution as well as innovation. In the 1850’s and 1860’s, women wore crinoline skirts that eventually evolved into gigantic cages that could hardly fit through a doorway. They were so popular that women of every status participated dressing in this style. For the upper classes, by the late 1860’s, the crinoline had nowhere else to go but up. When the new bustle style debuted, it was ridiculed and laughed at by the lower class women. This leads me to conclude that separation of the classes may have been a mitigating factor in the adoption of the bustle by upper class women. Interestingly enough, the crinoline continued on in fashion until about 1878.
The early bustle period was marked by extreme embellishment. Ruffles, trains, bows, tassels, and extra folds of fabric were all employed to trim dresses. The skirts’ shape was one of general largeness. The bustle fell off the rear end and continued down to the floor. Excess fabric was a hallmark of this period. By 1876, the bustle began shrinking but the skirt still remained voluminous and by the end of the early bustle period the posterior bump had moved into fabric folds and down to the back of the knee and lower in a fan style. This streamlined fashion remained for another six years before the bustle came back bigger that ever in 1883. A nearly shelf-sized shape marks the later bustle period.
The contraptions that held up skirts ranged from coiled springs to rounded horsehair bags. The full-length bustles that marked the sloping style of the early period were cumbersome to sit in as well as carry and control while walking. The second period’s bustles were lightweight and collapsible for easy sitting. Clean, simple lines marked the later bustle period. The embellishments of the early period were completely gone but the layers of fabric remained. The bustle successfully hid a multitude of flaws until 1889, when the Aesthetic movement began to sew its seeds.
The evolution of the bustle style is evident, but where did something so outrageous come from? As stated above, this is, of course, a question for speculation. Many clothing styles seem to evolve out of the pure ingenuity of its designer and the sheer desire for consumption by the wealthy. For all of the history of clothing, more has always been more. The bustle was a way to show wealth and superiority through yards and yards of fabric. It even required more fabric than the crinoline style that preceded it. Only the well-to-do could afford excess fabric for embellishment and the desire for the upper classes to remain isolated from the lower classes both in rank and in style was fierce. This has contributed to any number of seemingly impossible fashion styles through the ages. For a woman who had to keep a home clean and food on the table, the bustle must have seemed ridiculous. Trying to work with a wire contraption tied to your rear end must have been impossible at best.
Although upper class ladies did not have to work and could present themselves fashionably, hard-to-negotiate costumes isolated upper class women even further. In an ironic twist of fate, secluding their bodies kept these women in a prison of their own making, perpetuating the myth of the weaker sex just as the corset did. Sex in fashion is always an underlying theme.
Victorian men must have benefited from the sex appeal the bustle style exuded. A man’s imagination could have run wild wondering what part of the style was all woman and what part was manufactured. One must remember that in this time period, a woman could cause quite the scandal if she flashed an ankle in public! For the most part a man could only dream of the flesh under the clothing. The bustle style made the posterior appear larger which in turn caused the breasts to look larger as well. Add to that the corseted waist and you have one sexy silhouette.
Sexually suggestive styles, like the bustle, will always occupy a special place in the hearts of fashion lovers everywhere. When looking to the past for inspiration, Gothic fashion lovers can romanticize the subtle sexiness of the Victorian bustle.
One can easily create a modern bustle using items found around the house. I myself fill a rectangular shaped piece of stretch net fabric with a crinoline skirt of any size and tie it to my waist. When I put a skirt on over it with a bustle shape you’d never know the difference. Skirts can also emulate the bustle style easily with attached strings that bunch the fabric (such as the offering from Calypso in Shopping Sources below).
Antique Victorian skirts with bustles can be found in a range of prices and conditions and many are repairable and adaptable to modern sizes. The bustle itself is such an extraordinarily constructed foundation garment that today one could even wear it as an accessory on the outside of a garment. It has even inspired today’s fashion designers like Vivienne Westwood and John Galliano. The bustle has a silhouette that reeks of romance and Goth at the same time. Take time to appreciate its ingenious construction as well as its place in the fashion hall of oddities.
Sunday, April 16, 2017
Queen Victoria's Love, - Prince Albert...
| Prince Albert | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince Consort | |||||
Portrait by Winterhalter, 1859
| |||||
| Consort of the British monarch | |||||
| Tenure | 10 February 1840 – 14 December 1861 | ||||
| Born | 26 August 1819 Schloss Rosenau, Coburg, Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, Germany | ||||
| Died | 14 December 1861 (aged 42) Windsor Castle, Berkshire, UK | ||||
| Burial | 23 December 1861 St George's Chapel, Windsor; 18 December 1862 Frogmore, Windsor | ||||
| Spouse | Queen Victoria (m. 1840) | ||||
| Issue |
| ||||
| |||||
| House | Saxe-Coburg and Gotha | ||||
| Father | Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha | ||||
| Mother | Princess Louise of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg | ||||
Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Francis Albert Augustus Charles Emmanuel;[1] created Prince Consort 1857; 26 August 1819 – 14 December 1861) was the husband of Queen Victoria.
He was born in the Saxon duchy of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld to a family connected to many of Europe's ruling monarchs. At the age of 20, he married his first cousin, Queen Victoria; they had nine children. Initially he felt constrained by his role of consort, which did not afford him any power or responsibilities, but gradually developed a reputation for supporting many public causes, such as educational reform and the abolition of slavery worldwide, and was entrusted with running the Queen's household, office and estates. He was heavily involved with the organisation of the Great Exhibition of 1851, which was a resounding success.
The Queen came to depend more and more on his support and guidance. He aided the development of Britain's constitutional monarchy by persuading his wife to be less partisan in her dealings with Parliament—although he actively disagreed with the interventionist foreign policy pursued during Lord Palmerston's tenure as Foreign Secretary.
Albert died at the relatively young age of 42, plunging the Queen into deep mourning for the rest of her life. Upon Queen Victoria's death in 1901, their eldest son succeeded as Edward VII, the first British monarch of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, named after the ducal house to which Albert belonged.
Early life
Albert was born at Schloss Rosenau, near Coburg, Germany, the second son of Ernest III, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, and his first wife, Louise of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg.[2]Albert's future wife, Victoria, was born earlier in the same year with the assistance of the same midwife.[3] Albert was baptised into the Lutheran Evangelical Church on 19 September 1819 in the Marble Hall at Schloss Rosenau with water taken from the local river, the Itz.[4] His godparents were his paternal grandmother, the Dowager Duchess of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld; his maternal grandfather, the Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg; the Emperor of Austria; the Duke of Teschen; and Emanuel, Count of Mensdorff-Pouilly.[5] In 1825, Albert's great-uncle, Frederick IV, Duke of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg, died. His death led to a realignment of Saxon duchies the following year and Albert's father became the first reigning duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.[6]
Albert and his elder brother, Ernest, spent their youth in a close companionship marred by their parents' turbulent marriage and eventual separation and divorce.[7] After their mother was exiled from court in 1824, she married her lover, Alexander von Hanstein, Count of Polzig and Beiersdorf. She presumably never saw her children again, and died of cancer at the age of 30 in 1831.[8] The following year, their father married his own niece, his sons' cousin Princess Antoinette Marie of Württemberg; their marriage was not close, however, and Antoinette Marie had little—if any—impact on her stepchildren's lives.[9]
The brothers were educated privately at home by Christoph Florschütz and later studied in Brussels, where Adolphe Quetelet was one of their tutors.[10] Like many other German princes, Albert attended the University of Bonn, where he studied law, political economics, philosophy and the history of art. He played music and excelled at sport, especially fencing and riding.[11] His tutors at Bonn included the philosopher Fichte and the poet Schlegel.[12]
Marriage
By 1836, the idea of marriage between Albert and his cousin, Victoria, had arisen in the mind of their ambitious uncle Leopold, who had been King of the Belgians since 1831.[13] At this time, Victoria was the heiress presumptive to the British throne. Her father, Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of King George III, had died when she was a baby, and her elderly uncle, King William IV, had no legitimate children. Her mother the Duchess of Kent, was the sister of both Albert's father—the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha—and King Leopold. Leopold arranged for his sister, Victoria's mother, to invite the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and his two sons to visit her in May 1836, with the purpose of meeting Victoria. William IV, however, disapproved of any match with the Coburgs, and instead favoured the suit of Prince Alexander, second son of the Prince of Orange. Victoria was well aware of the various matrimonial plans and critically appraised a parade of eligible princes.[14] She wrote, "[Albert] is extremely handsome; his hair is about the same colour as mine; his eyes are large and blue, and he has a beautiful nose and a very sweet mouth with fine teeth; but the charm of his countenance is his expression, which is most delightful."[15] Alexander, on the other hand, she described as "very plain".[15]
Victoria wrote to her uncle Leopold to thank him "for the prospect of great happiness you have contributed to give me, in the person of dear Albert ... He possesses every quality that could be desired to render me perfectly happy."[16] Although the parties did not undertake a formal engagement, both the family and their retainers widely assumed that the match would take place.[17]
Victoria came to the throne aged just eighteen on 20 June 1837. Her letters of the time show interest in Albert's education for the role he would have to play, although she resisted attempts to rush her into marriage.[18] In the winter of 1838–39, the prince visited Italy, accompanied by the Coburg family's confidential adviser, Baron Stockmar.[19]
Albert returned to the United Kingdom with Ernest in October 1839 to visit the Queen, with the object of settling the marriage.[20] Albert and Victoria felt mutual affection and the Queen proposed to him on 15 October 1839.[21] Victoria's intention to marry was declared formally to the Privy Council on 23 November,[22] and the couple married on 10 February 1840 at the Chapel Royal, St James's Palace.[23]Just before the marriage, Albert was naturalised by Act of Parliament,[24] and granted the style of Royal Highness by an Order in Council.[1]
Initially Albert was not popular with the British public; he was perceived to be from an impoverished and undistinguished minor state, barely larger than a small English county.[25] The British Prime Minister, Lord Melbourne, advised the Queen against granting her husband the title of "King Consort"; Parliament also objected to Albert being created a peer—partly because of anti-German sentiment and a desire to exclude Albert from any political role.[26] Albert's religious views provided a small amount of controversy when the marriage was debated in Parliament: although as a member of the Lutheran Evangelical Church Albert was a Protestant, the non-Episcopal nature of his church was considered worrisome.[27] Of greater concern, however, was that some of Albert's family were Roman Catholic.[28] Melbourne led a minority government and the opposition took advantage of the marriage to weaken his position further. They opposed the ennoblement of Albert and granted him a smaller annuity than previous consorts,[29] £30,000 instead of the usual £50,000.[30] Albert claimed that he had no need of a British peerage, writing: "It would almost be a step downwards, for as a Duke of Saxony, I feel myself much higher than a Duke of York or Kent."[31] For the next seventeen years, Albert was formally titled "HRH Prince Albert" until, on 25 June 1857, Victoria formally granted him the title Prince Consort.[32]
Consort of the Queen
The position in which the prince was placed by his marriage, while one of distinction, also offered considerable difficulties; in Albert's own words, "I am very happy and contented; but the difficulty in filling my place with the proper dignity is that I am only the husband, not the master in the house."[33] The Queen's household was run by her former governess,[34] Baroness Lehzen. Albert referred to her as the "House Dragon", and manoeuvred to dislodge the Baroness from her position.[35]
Within two months of the marriage, Victoria was pregnant. Albert started to take on public roles; he became President of the Society for the Extinction of Slavery (slavery had already been abolished throughout the British Empire, but was still lawful in places such as the United States and the colonies of France); and helped Victoria privately with her government paperwork.[36] In June 1840, while on a public carriage ride, Albert and the pregnant Victoria were shot at by Edward Oxford, who was later judged insane. Neither Albert nor Victoria was hurt and Albert was praised in the newspapers for his courage and coolness during the attack.[37] Albert was gaining public support as well as political influence, which showed itself practically when, in August, Parliament passed the Regency Act 1840 to designate him regent in the event of Victoria's death before their child reached the age of majority.[38] Their first child, Victoria, named after her mother, was born in November. Eight other children would follow over the next seventeen years. All nine children survived to adulthood, a fact which biographer Hermione Hobhouse credited to Albert's "enlightened influence" on the healthy running of the nursery.[39] In early 1841, he successfully removed the nursery from Lehzen's pervasive control, and in September 1842, Lehzen left Britain permanently—much to Albert's relief.[40]
After the 1841 general election, Melbourne was replaced as Prime Minister by Sir Robert Peel, who appointed Albert as chairman of the Royal Commission in charge of redecorating the new Palace of Westminster. The Palace had burned down seven years before, and was being rebuilt. As a patron and purchaser of pictures and sculpture, the commission was set up to promote the fine arts in Britain. The commission's work was slow, and the architect, Charles Barry, took many decisions out of the commissioners' hands by decorating rooms with ornate furnishings that were treated as part of the architecture.[41] Albert was more successful as a private patron and collector. Among his notable purchases were early German and Italian paintings—such as Lucas Cranach the Elder's Apollo and Diana and Fra Angelico's St Peter Martyr—and contemporary pieces from Franz Xaver Winterhalter and Edwin Landseer.[42] Ludwig Gruner, of Dresden, assisted Albert in buying pictures of the highest quality.[43]
Albert and Victoria were shot at again on both 29 and 30 May 1842, but were unhurt. The culprit, John Francis, was detained and condemned to death, although he was later reprieved.[44] Some of their early unpopularity came about because of their stiffness and adherence to protocol in public, though in private the couple were more easy-going.[45] In early 1844, Victoria and Albert were apart for the first time since their marriage when he returned to Coburg on the death of his father.[46]
By 1844, Albert had managed to modernise the royal finances and, through various economies, had sufficient capital to purchase Osborne House on the Isle of Wight as a private residence for their growing family.[47] Over the next few years a house modelled in the style of an Italianate villa was built to the designs of Albert and Thomas Cubitt.[48] Albert laid out the grounds, and improved the estate and farm.[49] Albert managed and improved the other royal estates; his model farm at Windsor was admired by his biographers,[50] and under his stewardship the revenues of the Duchy of Cornwall—the hereditary property of the Prince of Wales—steadily increased.[51]
Unlike many landowners who approved of child labour and opposed Peel's repeal of the Corn Laws, Albert supported moves to raise working ages and free up trade.[52] In 1846, Albert was rebuked by Lord George Bentinck when he attended the debate on the Corn Laws in the House of Commons to give tacit support to Peel.[53] During Peel's premiership, Albert's authority behind, or beside, the throne became more apparent. He had access to all the Queen's papers, was drafting her correspondence[54] and was present when she met her ministers, or even saw them alone in her absence.[55] The clerk of the Privy Council, Charles Greville, wrote of him: "He is King to all intents and purposes."[56]
Reformer and innovator
In 1847, Albert was elected Chancellor of the University of Cambridge after a close contest with the Earl of Powis.[57] Albert used his position as Chancellor to campaign successfully for reformed and more modern university curricula, expanding the subjects taught beyond the traditional mathematics and classics to include modern history and the natural sciences.[58]
That summer, Victoria and Albert spent a rainy holiday in the west of Scotland at Loch Laggan, but heard from their doctor, Sir James Clark, that his son had enjoyed dry, sunny days farther east at Balmoral Castle. The tenant of Balmoral, Sir Robert Gordon, died suddenly in early October, and Albert began negotiations to take over the lease from the owner, the Earl Fife.[59] In May the following year, Albert leased Balmoral, which he had never visited, and in September 1848 he, his wife and the older children went there for the first time.[60] They came to relish the privacy it afforded.[61]
Revolutions spread throughout Europe in 1848 as the result of a widespread economic crisis. Throughout the year, Victoria and Albert complained about Foreign Secretary Palmerston's independent foreign policy, which they believed destabilised foreign European powers further.[62] Albert was concerned for many of his royal relatives, a number of whom were deposed. He and Victoria, who gave birth to their daughter Louise during that year, spent some time away from London in the relative safety of Osborne. Although there were sporadic demonstrations in England, no effective revolutionary action took place, and Albert even gained public acclaim when he expressed paternalistic, yet well-meaning and philanthropic, views.[63] In a speech to the Society for the Improvement of the Condition of the Labouring Classes, of which he was President, he expressed his "sympathy and interest for that class of our community who have most of the toil and fewest of the enjoyments of this world".[64] It was the "duty of those who, under the blessings of Divine Providence, enjoy station, wealth, and education" to assist those less fortunate than themselves.[64]
A man of progressive and relatively liberal ideas, Albert not only led reforms in university education, welfare, the royal finances and slavery, he had a special interest in applying science and art to the manufacturing industry.[65] The Great Exhibition of 1851 arose from the annual exhibitions of the Society of Arts, of which Albert was President from 1843, and owed most of its success to his efforts to promote it.[51][66] Albert served as president of the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851, and had to fight for every stage of the project.[67] In the House of Lords, Lord Brougham fulminated against the proposal to hold the exhibition in Hyde Park.[68] Opponents of the exhibition prophesied that foreign rogues and revolutionists would overrun England, subvert the morals of the people, and destroy their faith.[69]Albert thought such talk absurd and quietly persevered, trusting always that British manufacturing would benefit from exposure to the best products of foreign countries.[51]
The Queen opened the exhibition in a specially designed and built glass building known as the Crystal Palace on 1 May 1851. It proved a colossal success.[70] A surplus of £180,000 was used to purchase land in South Kensington on which to establish educational and cultural institutions—including the Natural History Museum, Science Museum, Imperial College London and what would later be named the Royal Albert Hall and the Victoria and Albert Museum.[71] The area was referred to as "Albertopolis" by sceptics.[72]
Family and public life (1852–1859)
In 1852, John Camden Neild, an eccentric miser, left Victoria an unexpected legacy, which Albert used to obtain the freehold of Balmoral. As usual, he embarked on an extensive program of improvements.[73] The same year, he was appointed to several of the offices left vacant by the death of the Duke of Wellington, including the mastership of Trinity House and the colonelcy of the Grenadier Guards.[74] With Wellington's passing, Albert was able to propose and campaign for modernisation of the army, which was long overdue.[75] Thinking that the military was unready for war, and that Christian rule was preferable to Islamic rule, Albert counselled a diplomatic solution to conflict between the Russian and Ottoman empires. Palmerston was more bellicose, and favoured a policy that would prevent further Russian expansion.[76] Palmerston was manoeuvred out of the cabinet in December 1853, but at about the same time a Russian fleet attacked the Ottoman fleet at anchor at Sinop. The London press depicted the attack as a criminal massacre, and Palmerston's popularity surged as Albert's fell.[77] Within two weeks, Palmerston was re-appointed as a minister. As public outrage at the Russian action continued, false rumours circulated that Albert had been arrested for treason and was being held prisoner in the Tower of London.[78]
By March 1854, Britain and Russia were embroiled in the Crimean War. Albert devised a master-plan for winning the war by laying siege to Sevastopol while starving Russia economically, which became the Allied strategy after the Tsar decided to fight a purely defensive war.[79] Early British optimism soon faded as the press reported that British troops were ill-equipped and mismanaged by aged generals using out-of-date tactics and strategy. The conflict dragged on as the Russians were as poorly prepared as their opponents. The Prime Minister, Lord Aberdeen, resigned and Palmerston succeeded him.[80] A negotiated settlement eventually put an end to the war with the Treaty of Paris. During the war, Albert arranged to marry his fourteen-year-old daughter, Victoria, to Prince Frederick William of Prussia, though Albert delayed the marriage until Victoria was seventeen. Albert hoped that his daughter and son-in-law would be a liberalising influence in the enlarging but very conservative Prussian state.[81]
Albert promoted many public educational institutions. Chiefly at meetings in connection with these he spoke of the need for better schooling.[83] A collection of his speeches was published in 1857. Recognised as a supporter of education and technological progress, he was invited to speak at scientific meetings, such as the memorable address he delivered as president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science when it met at Aberdeen in 1859.[84] His espousal of science met with clerical opposition; he and Palmerston unsuccessfully recommended a knighthood for Charles Darwin, after the publication of On the Origin of Species, which was opposed by the Bishop of Oxford.[85]
Albert continued to devote himself to the education of his family and the management of the royal household.[86] His children's governess, Lady Lyttelton, thought him unusually kind and patient, and described him joining in family games with enthusiasm.[87] He felt keenly the departure of his eldest daughter for Prussia when she married her fiancé at the beginning of 1858,[88] and was disappointed that his eldest son, the Prince of Wales, did not respond well to the intense educational programme that Albert had designed for him.[89] At the age of seven, the Prince of Wales was expected to take six hours of instruction, including an hour of German and an hour of French every day.[90] When the Prince of Wales failed at his lessons, Albert caned him.[91] Corporal punishment was common at the time, and was not thought unduly harsh.[92] Albert's biographer Roger Fulford wrote that the relationships between the family members were "friendly, affectionate and normal ... there is no evidence either in the Royal Archives or in the printed authorities to justify the belief that the relations between the Prince and his eldest son were other than deeply affectionate."[93] Philip Magnus wrote in his biography of Albert's eldest son that Albert "tried to treat his children as equals; and they were able to penetrate his stiffness and reserve because they realised instinctively not only that he loved them but that he enjoyed and needed their company."[94]
Illness and death
Albert was seriously ill with stomach cramps in August 1859.[95] During a trip to Coburg in the autumn of 1860 he was driving alone in a carriage drawn by four horses that suddenly bolted. As the horses continued to gallop toward a stationary wagon waiting at a railway crossing, Albert jumped for his life from the carriage. One of the horses was killed in the collision, and Albert was badly shaken, though his only physical injuries were cuts and bruises. He told his brother and eldest daughter that he sensed his time had come.[96]
In March 1861, Victoria's mother and Albert's aunt, the Duchess of Kent, died and Victoria was grief-stricken; Albert took on most of the Queen's duties, despite being ill himself with chronic stomach trouble.[97] The last public event he presided over was the opening of the Royal Horticultural Gardens on 5 June 1861.[98] In August, Victoria and Albert visited the Curragh Camp, Ireland, where the Prince of Wales was doing army service. At the Curragh, the Prince of Wales was introduced, by his fellow officers, to Nellie Clifden, an Irish actress.[99]
By November, Victoria and Albert had returned to Windsor, and the Prince of Wales had returned to Cambridge, where he was a student. Two of Albert's cousins, King Pedro V and Prince Ferdinand of Portugal, died of typhoid fever.[100] On top of this news, Albert was informed that gossip was spreading in gentlemen's clubs and the foreign press that the Prince of Wales was still involved with Nellie Clifden.[101] Albert and Victoria were horrified by their son's indiscretion, and feared blackmail, scandal or pregnancy.[102] Although Albert was ill and at a low ebb, he travelled to Cambridge to see the Prince of Wales on 25 November[103] to discuss his son's indiscreet affair.[51] In his final weeks Albert suffered from pains in his back and legs.[104]
When the Trent Affair—the forcible removal of Confederate envoys from a British ship by Union forces during the American Civil War—threatened war between the United States and Britain, Albert was gravely ill, but intervened to soften the British diplomatic response.[105] On 9 December, one of Albert's doctors, William Jenner, diagnosed typhoid fever. Albert died at 10:50 p.m. on 14 December 1861 in the Blue Room at Windsor Castle, in the presence of the Queen and five of their nine children.[106] The contemporary diagnosis was typhoid fever, but modern writers have pointed out that Albert was ill for at least two years before his death, which may indicate that a chronic disease, such as Crohn's disease,[107] renal failure, or abdominal cancer, was the cause of death.[108]
Legacy
Further information: Royal eponyms in Canada
The Queen's grief was overwhelming, and the tepid feelings the public had felt previously for Albert were replaced by sympathy.[109]Victoria wore black in mourning for the rest of her long life, and Albert's rooms in all his houses were kept as they had been, even with hot water brought in the morning, and linen and towels changed daily.[110] Such practices were not uncommon in the houses of the very rich.[111] Victoria withdrew from public life and her seclusion eroded some of Albert's work in attempting to re-model the monarchy as a national institution setting a moral, if not political, example.[112] Albert is credited with introducing the principle that the British royal family should remain above politics.[113] Before his marriage to Victoria, she supported the Whigs; for example, early in her reign Victoria managed to thwart the formation of a Tory government by Sir Robert Peel by refusing to accept substitutions which Peel wanted to make among her ladies-in-waiting.[114]
Albert's body was temporarily entombed in St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle,[115] until a year after his death his remains were deposited at Frogmore Mausoleum, which remained incomplete until 1871.[116] The sarcophagus, in which both he and the Queen were eventually laid, was carved from the largest block of granite that had ever been quarried in Britain.[117] Despite Albert's request that no effigies of him should be raised, many public monuments were erected all over the country, and across the British Empire.[118] The most notable are the Royal Albert Hall and the Albert Memorial in London. The plethora of memorials erected to Albert became so great that Charles Dickens told a friend that he sought an "inaccessible cave" to escape from them.[119]
Places and objects named after Albert range from Lake Albert in Africa to the city of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, to the Albert Medal presented by the Royal Society of Arts. Four regiments of the British Army were named after him: 11th (Prince Albert's Own) Hussars; Prince Albert's Light Infantry; Prince Albert's Own Leicestershire Regiment of Yeomanry Cavalry, and The Prince Consort's Own Rifle Brigade. He and Queen Victoria showed a keen interest in the establishment and development of Aldershot in Hampshire as a garrison town in the 1850s. They had a wooden Royal Pavilion built there in which they would often stay when attending reviews of the army.[120]Albert established and endowed the Prince Consort's Library at Aldershot, which still exists today.[121]
Biographies published after his death were typically heavy on eulogy. Theodore Martin's five-volume magnum opus was authorised and supervised by Queen Victoria, and her influence shows in its pages. Nevertheless, it is an accurate and exhaustive account.[122] Lytton Strachey's Queen Victoria (1921) was more critical, but it was discredited in part by mid-twentieth-century biographers such as Hector Bolitho and Roger Fulford, who (unlike Strachey) had access to Victoria's journal and letters.[123] Popular myths about Prince Albert—such as the claim that he introduced Christmas trees to Britain—are dismissed by scholars.[124] Recent biographers, such as Stanley Weintraub, portray Albert as a figure in a tragic romance, who died too soon and was mourned by his lover for a lifetime.[51] In the 2009 movie The Young Victoria, Albert, played by Rupert Friend, is made into a heroic character; in the fictionalised depiction of the 1840 shooting, he is struck by a bullet—something that did not happen in real life.[125][126]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)